• Kathryn Watkins

Sexual Revolution: Liberation or Devastation?

Updated: Jul 4

Introduction - Alfred Kinsey and his Associates.


Alfred Charles Kinsey was born on the 23rd June 1894 in Hoboken, New Jersey. After studying biology and zoology he became the worlds most quoted "Sex Researcher"- considered the "Father of the Sexual Revolution" and god of " Sexual Liberty", but who really was this man? What was his "research" and how was it conducted? on whom? Where did the "data" for the basis of "Human Sexuality" come from? And most importantly, how, and to what extent did this "Sexologist" influence American society as well as the moral, social, and political order worldwide?


Although he is generally conveyed as a very quiet, moral and reserved man, the reality is much different. He was no "expert" in marriage counselling which ironically was where he started his research on human sexuality. He married the first woman he dated, Clara, who would subsequently be involved in his research along with the rest of the research team. It's well known that Kinsey was extremely particular in whom he chose to work with him as employees. For example, each one had to disclose their full "sex histories" (detailed accounts of all sexual encounters through their lives ) with Kinsey beforehand, and anyone to demonstrate moral family values, heterosexuality, no sex before marriage and held generally traditional/reserved opinions on sexuality would never be accepted. They were considered as repressed and "unhealthy" by Kinsey. There was a strict criteria to be met, without question, and only those who had the "anything goes" attitude were selected. In fact, co-author of Kinsey's first publication "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male" Dr Wardell Pomeroy related that Kinsey had hired him on the basis of his personal sex history, deducing that he;


"had not picked up all the taboos, and the inhibitions, and the guilts that ... [his] colleagues had ... " - (from Dr Reisman's Book "Kinsey, Sex and Fraud".)


Clyde Martin was the third author of "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male" and was another hand picked employee by Kinsey as his "statistician". He too, along with all of Kinsey's employees, engaged in sexual acts with others including their wives in Kinsey's home and in the sound proofed room at the Kinsey Institute based at Indiana University. Kinsey also engaged in sex acts with some of his students, as well as encouraging them to masturbate each other, including same sex masturbation and homosexual acts.


Clara Kinsey would allegedly bring “pudding or milk and cookies or something” and change the sheets which, according to Steward and Pomeroy, were soiled with secretions from male reproductive organs containing spermatozoa, as well as sweat, blood, and hot wax. But Mrs Kinsey did much more than that. James Jones (Author of Kinsey's biography) confirms that she was filmed masturbating and engaging in varied forms of sex with Alfred Kinsey’s young coauthors and assistants, including Wardell Pomeroy and Clyde Martin. There is no information as to whether Mrs Kinsey was expected to act out sexually with the team’s wives:


"No one felt the force of [Kinsey’s] unyielding demands more strongly than Clara [who] went along with the filming... as befitted the wife of the high priest of sexual liberation. Clara was filmed masturbating, and she was also filmed having sex with Pomeroy... Martin and his wife, Alice, flatly refused to be filmed as a couple.... [O]ne of the staff wives refused to have sex with Kinsey. Perhaps it was Alice [Martin’s wife].... One staff wife had an even stronger reaction. Complaining of “the sickening pressure” she was under to have sex on film with her spouse and other staff members, she told an interviewer, “I felt like my husband’s career at the Institute depended on it.”


"I saw some of the films.... when I took Paul Gebhard’s class on human sexual behavior, when I was a graduate student... [After Reisman’s] charges were made that Kinsey was a pedophile I was asked by the director of the Kinsey Institute at that time, to investigate those charges and report back to her... I did see films of Kinsey masturbating. I saw films of Mrs. Kinsey masturbating. If memory serves, I saw some films of staff having sex." - (From Dr Reisman's Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences)


Just to point out at this point to avoid confusion, Paul Gebhard was also a Kinsey associate and co-authored Kinsey's second publication - "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female" - Gebhard was Kinsey's successor and became Director of the Kinsey Institute upon his death. He featured in a documentary aired in the 1990's called "Kinsey's Pedophiles" and he died in 2015. I highly recommend this documentary, although extremely disturbing, you can get an idea of Gebhard's Moral compass and belief system, he too was involved in sex acts with numerous people, including Kinsey and associates, making sex films in the attic of the Kinsey home. Gebhard admitted that when collecting data from "volunteers" with their sex histories;


"We [were]… amoral at best and criminal at worst. Examples of amorality are our refusal to inform a wife that her husband has… an active venereal disease, and our refusal to tell parents that their child is involved in seriously deviant behavior. An example of criminality is our refusal to cooperate with authorities in apprehending a pedophile we had interviewed who was being sought for a [child] sex murder."


There are many more dark sides to Kinsey & Co that we will discuss further on.


The Research.


"Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male" was the first publication released in 1948 and caused some shockwaves around the world at the time. It should have been picked up and stopped in it's tracks from this moment, but it slipped through the net......or did it? What was the intent of this research? Why was it so pushed into mainstream and society as a whole and then generally widely accepted and even taken as gospel within academia and eventually the American Legal System?


Kinsey collected his data including sex histories from a sample of 18,000 males and females for his publications, although not all of the sample was used in the books......approximately 5,300 males and 6000 females. We aren't sure what happened to the 6,700 others in the original sample, perhaps the data is among the archives at Indiana University that they refuse to hand over to anybody requesting this information. To quote Clarence Tripp, another Kinsey associate, explicit sex partner and the Institutes photographer and filmographer who quite openly admitted he had "sexual relations" with dogs said;


"I photographed everything in the human animal when we could arrange it.... If the FBI were to come, demand to see our histories, I would destroy them first."


Who were the "sample?" - where did Kinsey get the data from? 25% of Kinsey's male sample were either prisoners or sex offenders and pedophiles. Yes PEDOPHILES. Did the sample Kinsey used then, truly represent the whole of the American Male Population at the time? Using a quick google search of the US population in 1948 it states 146,631,302. Even if we take a rough guess at half applying to the male population it equates to 73,315,651. We could also take into account children at this point but you'll see why i'm including the WHOLE male population in this as per Kinsey's ideology that we are all sexual from birth. This works out as 0.007% of the male population. Is this really a true representation of the whole american male populations sexual behaviour? Especially when we consider at least a quarter of his sample were either sex offenders or pedophiles, many of them were also homosexuals and male prostitutes.


Just to note, i understand that samples are used for scientific purposes and it would be impossible to sample the whole world, however, we are not talking about a survey on a chocolate bar here, we are talking about a very important issue that has managed to trickle down through society for almost 80 years and has caused nothing but destruction, devastation, trauma and ever increasing danger to our society and most importantly, our children.


There was also an issue with Kinsey's data collection by using the "voluntary method" - this was a massive problem with this type of research and Kinsey knew this right from the start.


"There is an important principle involved in the selection of participants for sexuality studies-it is Maslow's principle of volunteer bias. Essentially, psychologist Abraham Maslow had shown long before the publication of Kinsey's work that, because of the intimate nature of sexuality research, the normal process of enlisting volunteers results in an over selection of persons who tend to exhibit (and take delight in admitting) unconventional behavior-ie, the percentage reporting "disapproved" behavior (eg, promiscuity, homosexuality) is inflated. Maslow personally demonstrated to the Kinsey team that this would apply to their volunteer group. Kinsey ignored Maslow's findings, refused to correct for the error predicted for his own sample and deceitfully claimed in his Male Report that it was not known how this factor could have affected his results. Abraham Maslow, the expert on the subject of how volunteers can skew the results of sex surveys, gave Kinsey notice-and evidence-of the effect on his own research. But Kinsey withheld the evidence, even as he wrote in his first book that "how [volunteering] affects a sexual history is not yet clear" - (Kinsey, Sex and Fraud)


This was a VITAL piece of information that was clearly purposely withheld by Kinsey himself, he was warned and he ignored it for his own gains, he wanted nothing to interfere with what he was to present to the world as "fact".


Before we move forward i'd like to note that Kinsey believed in Darwinism (this is for another blog) and having been a zoologist, studying male and female animals sexuality, his "belief" in this was strong. He believed we were "mammalian" and as mammals have sex from a very young age, that it's perfectly natural for human beings to do the same. This is what he set out to "prove" as fact.


Within the pages of "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male" is a table titled "Examples of Multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males".


Take a really good look at this table......I am astounded that not every person that reads this information is not seriously disturbed, disgusted and sickened by it. This clearly indicates that boys as young as FIVE MONTHS of age were "stimulated" to "orgasm" as Kinsey calls it. Well HOW? who did this? Kinsey's pedophiles did this, they were requested by him and his associates and given clear instructions on how to "record" their sexual encounters with babies and children using a stopwatch and report back with the results. This alone, before we go any further is CLEARLY CRIMINAL! this table is documenting the actual sexual abuse of children and not enough people picked up on it to do something about it immediately. Had that been the case, we would not be in this total mess where we are almost at the stage of wide acceptance of pedophilia.


What "orgasms?" is Kinsey talking about? what constitutes as an "orgasm" in his own view?


1. Reactions primarily genital: Little or no evidence of body tension… penis becomes more rigid and may be involved in mild throbs, or throbs may be limited to urethra alone; semen (in the adult) seeps from urethra without forcible ejaculation; climax passes with minor after-effects. A fifth (22%) of the pre-adolescent cases on which there are sufficient data belong here, and probably an even higher proportion of older males. [Recall, no “adult males” are studied.]


2. Some body tension…twitching of one or both legs, of the mouth, of the arms, or of other particular parts of the body... rigidity of the whole body and some throbbing of the penis; orgasm with a few spasms but little after-effect... involving nearly half (45%) of the pre-adolescent males, and perhaps a corresponding number of adult males. [Recall, no “adult males” were studied.]


3. Extreme tension with violent convulsion: Often involving the sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body… that the legs often become rigid, with muscles knotted and toes pointed, muscles of abdomen contracted and hard, shoulders and neck stiff and often bent forward, breath held or gasping, eyes staring or tightly closed, hands grasping, mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching, sometimes synchronously with throbs or violent jerking of the penis… still more violent convulsions of the whole body; heavy breathing, groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children), the orgasm or ejaculation involving several minutes (in one case up to five minutes) of recurrent spasm… the individual is often capable of participating in a second or further experience. About one sixth (17%) of the pre-adolescent boys, a smaller percentage of adult males. [Recall, no “adult males” were studied.]


4. As in either type 1 or 2; but with hysterical laughing, talking, sadistic or masochistic reactions, rapid motions (whether in masturbation or in intercourse), culminating in more or less frenzied movements which are continued through the orgasm. A small percentage (5%) of either preadolescent or adult males. [Recall, no “adult males” were studied.]


5. As in any of the above; but culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting of subject. Sometimes happens only in the boy’s first experience, occasionally occurs throughout the life of an individual. Regular in only a few (3%) of the pre-adolescent or adult males. [Recall, no “adult males” were studied.] Such complete collapse is more common and better known among females.


6. Pained or frightened.… The genitalia… become hypersensitive…some males suffer excruciating pain and may scream if movement is continued or the penis even touched. For Darwin, an expression interpreted as “hysterical.” For Kinsey, an expression interpreted as orgasm. For Darwin, an expression interpreted as "fear." For Kinsey, an expression interpreted as orgasm. For Darwin, an expression interpreted as “pain.” For Kinsey, an expression interpreted as orgasm.


7. Males in the present group become similarly hypersensitive before the arrival of actual orgasm will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive definite pleasure from the situation. Such individuals quickly return to complete the experience, or to have a second experience if the first was complete. About 8 per cent of the younger boys are involved here, but it is a smaller percentage of older boys and adults [Recall, no “adult males” were studied] which continue these reactions throughout life. - (Kinsey_Crimes and Consequences)


Look at the table again.....These apparent "orgasms" of trembling, screaming, crying, fighting to get away from the ABUSER, convulsing and fainting are all being connected with babies as young as 5 months old! Do not be desensitised by the Kinseyan language of "adult partners, sexual relations and adult-child sex" . This is rape and abuse by an adult of a child, no matter how it's worded. This is very common throughout Kinseyan ideology, they are very careful with their words.


Those children in that table were being abused by pedophiles, many of them within the home. Especially for the "female" publication which we will get to soon. What happened to those poor children? It was never followed up on how they were affected by the abuse, going completely against Kinsey's idea that "sex with children does them no harm" - this is evidently false and we have 8 decades of kinseyan ideology to prove it. According to the above table a 4 year old was "stimulated" to orgasm 26 times over a 24 hour period???? What?! So he was abused by a pedophile for a solid 24 hours and this was not picked up??? Even being awake for 24 hours as a FOUR year old would be considered as neglect from the parents! BEFORE adding the sexual abuse! Where were the parents of these children? Absolutely none of this information was ever disclosed.


Kinsey and associates believed that the only harm from "adult-child sex" (rape of a child) is not physical or even mental or emotional but caused by the parents or the police becoming hysterical when finding out that the child has been abused by an adult.......


"Kinsey ... though he never denied the reality of child sexual abuse, did as much as he could to minimize its importance. Some 80 per cent of the women who had experienced a childhood sexual approach by an adult reported to Kinsey's investigative team that they had been frightened and upset by the incident. Kinsey cavalierly belittled these reports. He hastened to assure the public that children should not be upset by these experiences. If they were, this was the fault not of the sexual aggressor, but of prudish parents and teachers who caused the child to become "hysterical". - (Kinsey, sex and fraud)


This somewhat refutes Clarence Tripps admission with regards to "Sexual Behaviour of the Human Female". He states in the documentary "Kinsey's pedophiles" when referring to Nazi pedophile Rex King whom was used by Kinsey for his "data";


"The children thought he was wonderful.... There was no force, no damage, no harm, no pain.... Well, there were two instances in which a young boy or girl – I think it was a girl— agreed to the sexual contact but then they found it very painful and yelled out when it actually took place. This was because they were very young and had small genitalia and [King] was a grown man with enormous genitalia and there was a fit problem."


If this doesn't make your stomach turn over then we have a HUGE issue. A "fit problem?" Absolutely SICKENING.


Dr. Robert Dickinson, Kinsey’s famous “mentor in sex research,” had “collaborated with the pedophile [King] for several years, and taught him how to record his child abuse in scientific detail.


"Tripp reported: Dickinson taught him [Rex King] how to measure things, and time things, and encouraged him to—he knew he was going to do his ordinary behavior anyway, Dickinson couldn’t have stopped him from being a pedophile—but he said, at least you ought to do something scientific about it so it won’t be just your jollies, it’ll be something worthwhile, so he gave him some training by letter and correspondence. [Emphasis added.]"


Rex King was a World War II storm trooper who abused hundreds of children whom were at his disposal. He passed this "data" onto Kinsey of course and were likely included in Kinsey's samples for the Male and Female volumes. He was described as "Mr X" in Kinsey's biography before later learning his true identity (Rex King) after the documentary "Kinsey's pedophiles" was aired on TV in the 1990's.


"Out of 317 cases [King] records having to force cooperation on five occasions: aged 2, 4, 7, 10 15 (Willy Price).... He likes to arouse boys... King records in the history the color, taste and smell of the semen. Also, when he can, examines adolescent semen for sperm.... Does it with mother and son... Some of his women masturbate their children for him....” [Gathorne-Hardy reads from record] "Experimented with baby.... Could take head of [male sex organ] in mouth easily.... His success in getting his huge range was, like Kinsey that he not only did not disapprove, he was happy to join in... seducing boys and men.... In a few minutes [the boy] was laughing and did not hold it against me. Fact is he seemed proud he had done it. I praised him and told him he was some kid to take a 7” **** down his throat and up his *** the same night.... [Got boys] round to discussing sex... excited them... [show graphic sex]. Listened.... They felt safe and warm and happy.”


[King] had sex with men, women, children and animals.... Nursery school people... parents... couldn’t give us the extraordinary detail that [King] did. It was illegal and we knew it was illegal and that’s why a lot of people are furious... they say we should have turned him in instantly... If we had turned him in it would have been the end of our research project." - (Kinsey_crimes and consequences)


Whilst Kinsey was a household name by 1957 (pioneer of sex education) other than the secrecy of the Kinsey team, no-one else knew that he was encouraging and guiding german Nazi pedophile Dr Fritz Von Balluseck as he sexually abused children. Would the public have widely accepted Kinsey's research on human sexuality had they known the origins? Would the Moral Penal Code and the American Legal System have been changed to accommodate his findings?


Balluseck was a disgusting nazi pedophile, a child rapist who molested hundreds of children. Whilst occupying Poland, Balluseck was given a position where he could easily access children and the Nazi's were well aware. He told the little polish girls that they had a choice....it was either him, or the gas chambers. All of the girls ended up dead whatever they chose. He abused his own daughter and his niece when she came to stay. One of the school boys he used homosexually and who later offered his services to other men, got arrested, and related to the police how Balluseck taught him everything....even the most hardened court reporters were warned “even if you think the worst, it is still not as bad as the reality.."


He recorded his crimes against at least 100 children in the smallest detail. He sent the detail of his experiences regularly to the US sex researcher, Kinsey. The latter was very interested, and kept up a regular and lively correspondence with Balluseck, who cut out Kinsey's signature and stuck it neatly in his diary. He reported many more assaults to Kinsey between 1952-1954, the only warning Kinsey gave to Balluseck within their communications was to "be careful" as in not to get caught by the authorities. This was highlighted within the first afternoon of Ballusecks trial.


"After a lengthy reading from Balluseck’s diaries, Dr. Berger (presiding judge in the case) exclaimed: “This is no longer human! What was this all for? To tell Kinsey about?” When asked by the judge why he even abused girls of 8 and 9, Balluseck retorted, he attained his goal more quickly with the younger ones, while the older ones often repelled him. In the course of the hearing, such horrible things were revealed that the participants in the trial breathed a sigh of relief when the trial was adjourned until Wednesday morning."


Balluseck was charged with 33 counts of indecent acts with minors or of having made them endure indecent acts. This case was kept quiet at the time due to danger of "public decency". They didn't even need these witnesses to come to court because Balluseck had kept such detailed and clear reports of his abuse to them. The judge on numerous occasions had to stop and said; "it is so painful to have to read this." We can only imagine the details of those reports, traumatising to even read, never mind to experience. What came out of those diaries was referred to as "indescribable".


To find out more information on the "observers" of Kinsey's research please watch both "Kinsey's Pedophiles" and "The Kinsey Syndrome". After some of the information was released from Indiana University it's clear that nine pedophiles were used by Kinsey for his samples on "child sexuality". These documentaries are by far 2 of the most disturbing you'll ever see.


I first came across Alfred Kinsey when i realised that the public school education in Wales was bringing in a new curriculum, based upon direction from UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) and SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States). A new global sex education from age 3. My gut sank immediately and i needed to know how and where it came from.


I came across "The Kinsey Syndrome" a documentary almost three hours long. As soon as i started to watch it I had a really sinking feeling, i knew it was going to lead somewhere really dark and it certainly did. At numerous points in this documentary I had to switch it off and get my breath back, I cried and my stomach tensed, i felt really sick and i didn't sleep for days. It really played on my mind and disturbed me in a big way, i couldn't believe what i was witnessing.


I remember i wrote a long facebook post attaching a warning for those who were going to watch it and there was a lot of interaction on that post. I still do give this same warning but only as a "heads up" and to be prepared. I know exactly how disturbing this is and sometimes i understand why people try and ignore it and won't look......BUT, we can't allow this to go on, it's vital that we all try and understand what has been and is going on right now because it directly affects the most precious and vulnerable of all, our children. If we stay silent, they become increasingly in danger.


You may wonder at this point what the connection between Alfred Kinsey and the education system of today may be. We'll come back to it.....


Kinsey was a huge fan of Aleister Crowley, a sadist occultist sex addict, deeply involved in black magic and satanic rituals of men, women, and children. Kinsey was obsessed with Crowley's teachings and wanted to obtain his diaries, although unsuccessful. Crowley died in 1947, the year before the release of the Male Volume, no doubt he would have been delighted in this. He truly was a disturbed very sick individual who's writings are echoed around the world even today, especially within the satanic music industry. Many "stars" quote Crowley often in their music............."Do what thou wilt" - regardless of any consequences so it would seem. Here are some examples of Crowley's disgusting poetry. I apologise for the vulgarity of this but it's paramount to understand what kind of so called "academics" set the stone for the "Sexual Revolution" and our public education system.


"Rub all the muck of your cunt on me Leah, Cunt, let me suck all your glued gonorrhea! Cunt! Without end, Amen! til you spend!"

"Cunt you have harboured all the dirt and disease, in your slimy unbarbered loose hole, with it's cheese and it's monthlies and pox, you chewer of cocks."



I am so sorry to have to write this, it makes me sick to my stomach and this isn't even the worst of it. I'll leave it here with Crowley, if you want to know more about him and his influence then watch this documentary as a starting place. My point of mentioning Crowley was to show you what kind of man Kinsey really was and the people whom empowered and liberated him. Remember the ideologies of these men went on to change the whole moral, political, educational and legal systems of the whole world......


Kinsey started the sexual revolution but it was Hugh Hefner and Kinsey's associates that would carry it through and finish it. Eight decades of Kinseyan Ideology has destroyed society to almost the point of no return.


Kinsey had a lifelong addiction to pornography. He used it as a tool for recruiting his young students into sex, and its utilization later in life as a stimulus for his increasing impotence. And just as Kinsey employed sexually explicit and obscene materials to desensitize others and usher them into the world of “anything goes,” Hugh Hefner, founder of Playboy magazine, can be credited with popularizing the Kinseyan concept of the “ideal woman”—not as wife and mother, but as a Playmate, with a new one every month.


Hefner was a huge fan of Kinsey and derived his "soft porn" publications from his "research" on human sexuality. As we have already seen, Kinsey's data was not only completely fraudulent, but also highly illegal in regard to his "child sample". The adult samples were not randomised at all, mostly comprised of sex offenders, male and female prostitutes, homosexuals and prisoners.....not exactly a fair sample of the "average human male or female" - nevertheless, Kinsey was Hefner's idol and the first ever playboy publication was released in 1953.


It was on the basis of Kinsey that soft porn was even introduced. The "anything goes" attitude fitted perfectly with Hefner's own ideologies and he used the "scholars" work to promote it through his publications, which would end up to be one of the most dangerous things to ever be released into society........


Serial rapist-murderer Ted Bundy illustrated the danger of pornography in January 1989 when he talked to psychologist Dr. James Dobson on the eve of his execution. Bundy maintained that "drug store pornography" helped change a vulnerable boy into the brutal mass murderer of over thirty women and girls:


"This is the message I want to get across, that as a young boy, and I mean a boy of twelve and thirteen certainly, that I encountered ... in the local grocery store, in a local drug store, the soft-core pornography that people call "soft-core" .... [W]hat I am talking about happened twenty, thirty years ago in my formative stages."


Moments before he was electrocuted, Bundy warned America about the sadosexual material children consume today:


"What scares and appalls me, Dr. Dobson, is when I see whats on cable TV, some of the movies and some of the violence in the movies that comes into homes today, with stuff that they wouldn't show in X-rated adult theaters thirty years ago . . . as it gets into the home to children who may be unattended or unaware that they may be a Ted Bundy".


Bundy was correct in his connection with pornography and sexual violence, this has been increasingly evident over the last 6 decades. Sex crimes have shot up in line with the onset of pornography especially since the inception of the internet. It is incredibly easily accessible for anyone, including children and this has proven to be a HUGE danger to children and society as a whole. Bundy also stated on the eve of his execution;


"Listen, i'm no social scientist and I haven't done a survey....I mean I don't pretend that I know what John Q citizen thinks about this but I've lived in prison for a long time now and i've met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence just like me, and without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography, without question, without exception, deeply influenced and consumed, an addiction to pornography."


On 6th May 1988 in the Washington Post it reported that experts estimated that one in four girls and one in seven boys will be sexually assaulted before they are eighteen years old generally by a relative or another trusted acquaintance.


In 1988 Michigan reported on 681 juveniles convicted of sexually assaulting younger children. The average age of the offender was fourteen! The average age of his victim was seven! Almost 60 percent of the sexual assaults involved penetration, and further, "93% of the [juvenile] offenders were acquaintances, friends, baby-sitters, or relatives of the victims."


The horror of this new wave of juvenile sexual assaults is just the tip of the iceberg. On 11 October 1984 the Washington Post reported that a high school girl was raped in a boys' school bathroom while at least ten other boys looked on cheering.


The Boston Herald, on 28 June 1984, ran a story that a twelve-year-old Pawtucket, Massachusetts boy raped a ten year-old girl on a pool table in a reenactment of the infamous "Big Dan" pool table gang rape of a woman. The "Big Dan" pool hall case had recently received wide media coverage.


Mimicking pictures in their mother's pornography magazines, a nine-year-old boy and his seven-year-old brother penetrated and killed an eight-month-old baby with a pencil and coat hanger in St. Petersburg, Florida, according to a report in the Buffalo News (24 April 1984).


Similarly, on 21 July 1990 the Washington Post reported on a ten-year-old boy who watched an X -rated film then raped an eight-year-old girl and her four-year-old sister.


The above cases of sexual abuse are taken from Dr Judith Reismans book "Soft porn plays hardball" and the reason i've brought these to attention is precisely to show the connection between pornography and sexual violence. Please also note the dates, this was over 3 decades ago BEFORE the internet was being widely used. The implications of this are enormous. These are not isolated cases, unfortunately this has become extremely commonplace.


According to Kinsey from his Female Volume and since his Male Volume had apparently proven that we are capable of sexual pleasure from birth and therefore it's "normal" and "natural". Out of his data came the "Kinsey Model" and based upon the following principles that many, including Hefner, interpreted as fact.


• All orgasms are “outlets” and equal— whether between husband and wife; boy and dog; man and boy, girl, or baby—since there is no such thing as abnormality or normality.

• As the aim of coitus is orgasm, the more orgasms from any “outlet,” at the earliest age, the healthier the person.

• Early masturbation is critical for sexual, physical, and emotional health. It can never be excessive or pathological.

• Sexual taboos and sex statutes are routinely broken, so they should be eliminated. That includes laws against rape and child rape, unless serious “force” is used and serious harm is proven.

• Since sex is, can be, and should be commonly shared with anyone and anything, jealousy is passé.

• All sexual experimentation before marriage will increase the likelihood of successful long term marriage, while venereal diseases and other socio-sexual maladies will be reduced dramatically.

• Human beings are naturally bisexual. Religious bigotry and prejudice force people into chastity, heterosexuality, and monogamy.

• Children are sexual and potentially orgasmic from birth and are not harmed by “consensual” incest or sex with adults. Indeed, they often benefit from such practices.

• There is no medical or other reason for adult-child sex or incest to be forbidden.

• All forms of sodomy are natural and healthy.

• Homosexuals represent ten to thirty-seven percent of the population or more. (Kinsey’s findings were fluid on this point.) Some educators have interpreted his findings to mean that only four to six percent of the population is exclusively heterosexual, so it is “heterosexual” bias that should be eliminated.


As Kinsey believed that the only harm to children from being molested was the reaction of hysterical parents and other adults, he believed that incestuous "relationships" were beneficial for young girls. He stated that the molester; "may have contributed favorably to their later sociosexual development.” In the female volume is the supposed beneficial effects of premarital sexual experiences. Such experiences, Kinsey states: “provide an opportunity for the females to learn to adjust emotionally to various types of males.”


During the Yorkshire interview (Kinsey's Pedophiles) Clarence Tripp (Kinsey's filmographer and sex partner) said that “we” ought to “rev up” children sexually “at an early age.” He and his colleagues hoped that it would “fix” people like this author (referring to Reisman) by “proving” that children have orgasms, thereby reducing disapproval of, and eliminating laws against, “molestation,” and the like:


"If we could only get those children with some kind of masturbation or something that would rev up their sexual substrate at an early time it would fix people like Judith Reisman immediately because then they’d respond and then they’d know what the rest of the world was like..."


Repeatedly, consumers of pornography define its impact upon their nervous systems, upon their lives and as an intoxicant. Back in 1948, misled by supposedly scientific facts disseminated by Dr. Alfred Kinsey and others, Joe College was additionally misled by his own brain's response to pornography and the promise of -"sexual freedom. " He did not realize that confusion, fear, shame, or even hate were emotions interwoven into his real and imagined sexual experiences. And he did not understand that just as emotion is connected to one's eyes, heart, fingers, and lungs, it is also connected to one's groin. The college male pornography consumers of the past generation were blind-sided by a product that appeared to be affirming rather than robbing them of their true sexuality. They gained a sexual revolution, and never knew what they lost along the way. (excerpt from Soft Porn plays Hardball)


As we have discussed, Kinsey's team argued voraciously that children need multiple orgasm outlets in order to be "sexually healthy". To even have to type these words is absolutely absurd but here we are. Kinsey's theory ridiculed man-woman love as well as intimate heterosexual intercourse, he argued that masturbation and homosexual sex were better than marital love. While Kinsey's scientific sex statistics swayed a small number of "academics" and others including Hefner, it was Hefner who swayed America and the rest of the western world. College boys in their drones became drawn in by the nude air-brushed images of young women and the minds of society slowly started to distort.


Playboy would be the open door to the new ideology of human sexuality laid out by sadomachochist Kinsey and would bring millions of men, young to old to it's doors. The breakdown of the family was already well underway and would continue to increase significantly throughout the next 6 decades.....


Thanks to playboy magazine, the once widely morally accepted family life was quickly replaced with a "sexual orientated" life with sexual pleasure being the only thing that mattered, regardless of the consequences. Kinsey's "idea" that sexual freedom was empowering and liberating with his "anything goes" attitude would in fact reinforce solid relationships that would fade by the wayside very quickly and the opposite became the case.


Promiscuity and early sexual encounters were encouraged. The magazine was much cheaper than a date and guaranteed sexual pleasure. The wife was being replaced with a fantasy not based in reality but promoted as "normal". When wives didn't want to act in the way their husbands were demanding, just like in the magazine, then things broke down within the relationship. Men would leave for something else, chasing that sexual pleasure on a continual loop. This would not be "beneficial" to men as Kinsey stated but would eventually lead in many cases to sexual deviance, an increase in divorce, single mothers in poverty, sexual predators, an increase in child on child abuse, sexual abuse, rape and murder.


Due to the lifestyle of "sexual freedom" and the associated toxic habits that come with it, disease is something that will commonly arise among the "sexually free" which is also incredibly dangerous. Rather than being warned of these dangers, they are being encouraged to carry on. What happened to the lady and gentleman?


"I think it can be said with reasonable certainty that no other single thing in popular communications has had more influence on the changing social-sexual values in the last twenty-odd years than Playboy. Without question. And its influence is far more dramatic than most people realize, especially on young people growing up, both male and female .... Playboy is almost twenty-five years old. The generation now running society is the first Playboy generation-the first to grow up with this significant influence on their lives and their influence has been felt across society." - (Thomas Wehy - Analysis of playboy 1978)


Kinsey preached early sexual experimentation as necessary for a full and happy adult sex life. Hefner, citing his mentor, sermonised on the socio-sexual values of early sex, attacking chastity and marriage. Due to Kinseyan impact on society in the fifties, we can better understand how it was adopted within the entertainment industry, in particular, hollywood, the music industry, TV shows and childrens shows. The sexual revolution was soaring, along with the increase in sexually active teenagers from 10% in 1950 to more than 50% and more in some groups by 1980, something that Kinsey assured wouldn't happen.


This then helped to usher in planned parenthoods goal of "legalising" abortion. It didn't matter how much sex teenagers were having or if they were careful because they could always just dispose of any unwanted babies, it was encouraged, as we can see today. Please take the time to watch this short presentation by Monica Cline who worked for Planned Parenthood for a decade and speaks of the horrors within the "sex education" widely taught today.


Hefner said he broke the barrier between "Madonna and whore." The underside to this view is that now all women, including wives, daughters, and mothers are also "whores", therefore rape is humorous, for it is a way of giving women the sex they want but are too embarrassed to admit or request. Even children and animals may be represented as existing to sexually service the needs of the playboy fantasy superstar.


Since Hefner claims his magazine shaped American men for at least one generation, if not two, we should now see very few cases of "perversion, neurosis, psychosis, unsuccessful marriage, divorce . . . suicide ... frigidity, impotence ... masochism, [and] sadism." Unfortunately in a post Kinsey/Hefner era, every one of these measures are documented as escalating dramatically, while whole new mutant forms of sexual violence (serial rape-murder), masturbatory (autoerotic) fatalities, have appeared from this world view. This is to be expected as the men Kinsey called typical American males were largely sexual deviants, homosexual activists, imprisoned sex criminals, male prostitutes and such, it is no wonder Kinsey (as quoted by Hefner) could find that "over 90 percent of the adult population would be in prison" if sex laws were enforced.


Let's not forget that all of the above was "normal sexual behaviour" in the eyes of Kinsey and Hefner and they worked exceptionally hard at changing the American Legal System to accommodate their "beliefs" even though the Kinsey samples were completely fraudulent and illegal. It's hard to believe reading this that they were successful, although at the same time we can see just how they worked to change american perception. With a MASSIVE rise in sexual offending, changing the legal system to ensure lenient sentences (if any sentence) has been one of the most dangerous moves ever made. This is why the legal system bends to sex offenders, the law has been written to protect the perpetrator and not the victim.


This is also why much abuse goes unreported. People are aware of the leniency towards sex offenders and injustice within the legal system and are understandably reluctant to come forward, many are too afraid and traumatised and MANY cases of incest go unreported due to the nature and family shame. Cases of sexual abuse among siblings don't get reported for the same reasons. Cases of child on child abuse are off the scale, and this is based on only those reported.....the reality is much higher. When the perpetrator becomes younger and younger, then so do the victims.


Children are seeing pornography from younger and younger ages, as young as 5 or 6. The internet is not a safe place for children. They are being groomed and are open targets for sexual abuse and it's happening on a frightening scale. A child's brain is not fully mature until into their 20's and they are HIGHLY influenced by their environments, especially stimuli like pornography. This is typically related to young teenage boys during puberty. Just like Ted Bundy explained, it can turn a normal 12 year old boy into a serial rapist practically overnight. So when young boys are seeing these images and films and it's stirring up a BIOLOGICAL feeling, a sensation that they obviously like but with a very immature brain, they act out what they see, on younger children. There are many many cases of this and it's climbing.


Hefner also fits the definition of a sex addict, like Kinsey. That is, a man who is unable to control his sexual appetite due to his overwhelming insecurity and inability to experience satisfaction. Patrick Anderson, another Hefner admirer, notes that Hefner has "slept with hundreds, even thousands, of beautiful young women." However, in a small note elsewhere, Anderson quotes Hefner saying he could never make "love" without drugs. Hefner admitted he felt little or nothing during sex. So, Hefner made "love" with drugs, not women. He also had a huge impotence problem, like Kinsey, which is a known problem with pornography addiction.


For over 60 years now, Kinseyan/Hefner ideology has influenced child rearing, legislation, psychology, and the behavior of college boys and girls, spouses, divorcees, parents, doctors, teachers, and national leaders. If it is true that whoever controls men's sexuality controls men, then the sex industry controls much of today's society. The wedding ring was the end of playboy, hustler, penthouse etc and that isn't good business for the sex industry, which is why they spent this time breaking down the family unit, attacking the wife and child.


Playboy was the first magazine to glorify drugs and rape, even of children and virgins by college men. Since 1954 playboy have been using cartoons to "teach" children about "adult-child sex" (rape) and incest. On May 22nd 1989 Playboy cartoonist Dwaine Tinsley (creator of "Chester the Molester") was arrested for child sexual abuse. He alone, created 145 cartoons printed for Hustler of various child abuse and incest scenarios including rape and violence as the overall theme. His cartoons suggest what he was doing in his personal life, in an interview with Tinsley the year before in 1988 this is what was said;


Q: Who is Chester the Molester?

A: Chester is a character that I do for the magazine (hustler). You have this dirty old guy who would do anything to trap a young girl ... the younger ones, 10 or 12. He would lay out candy for them like he was trying to trap a bird .... First of all if he's going to trap a little girl the idea for him would be to knock her out or something ... . I mean, he didn't have to actually use a club or bat. He could have smacked her, but just the idea of the bat is a little goofier. What's better than a baseball bat? It was always with him [Note the Glen Ridge High boys used a baseball bat with which to rape the young girl they had kidnapped].

Q: Don't you think that by making him [Chester the Molester] such a lovable, goofy type of guy, that somehow legitimizes what he is doing?

A: No, I don't think I was legitimizing child molesting. Chester was just a goofy kinda guy. Q: And by laughing at him, it doesn't make it fun on some level?

A: You mean that child molesting is okay?

Q: Not okay. That's too strong a word. But more okay.

A: More acceptable? More palatable? No. I really don't think so. I don't think that people were saying that it's okay to be a child molester. If l thought that, I wouldn't have done the character. Most of the letters I received were "I know he's a nut, really. He's such a goofy guy." ... Chester has restrictions now ... he can't go after minors, you know. It's almost acceptable if this goofy guy goes for a woman that's at least 18 years of age . . . it's not such a lovable offense anymore if he goes after a young girl.


As reported in the Washington Times, Dwaine Tinsley was convicted on multiple counts of child molestation in the spring of 1989. He had drugged his daughter, put her on birth control pills when she turned thirteen, and violently sexually abused her until she reached the age of eighteen. By then, she was a suicidal drug addict.


Hefner hand picked every single cartoon that was published in Playboy and his private vision of sexuality would be seen in his selection of them. On the evidence, Hefner enjoyed publishing photographs and cartoons of children being sexually assaulted by adults. No information is available on his possession and use of child pornography films and videos produced by others. Despite his rhetoric about his writers being "free" to publish and say what they wished, Hefner censored material in his magazine that challenged his personal views. Everything had to be approved by Hefner and must fit his view of sex, drugs, or whatever under threat of dismissal.


Even though Hefner didn't have much contact with his children, he did host his daughters "sweet 16" at the playboy mansion with 10 friends and according to him, "made love" with one of them and "bounced her around on the round bed, the temptation was too much." He was 42 years old.


The acceptance of and pleasure taken in child sexual abuse would begin at the top with Hefner, and trickle down to those he selected as cartoonists, photographers, editors, copy editors, and general staff. Notice this is exactly how Alfred Kinsey "selected" his team of researchers. From here, their views would move outward to the general society. The effects of this in today's society will be explained in more depth further on. It was disturbing in the 80's, it's beyond disturbing where this has taken mankind today and continues to do so until we do something about it.


Although extremely vulgar, distasteful and illegal, many people will argue that playboy, hustler and penthouse etc were for adults only.....and therefore children wouldn't be exposed to it, but we know that's not the case. Children find these magazines (pre internet days) and they are particularly attracted to the cartoons, enticing them with bright pretty colours and also using "super heros" as characters. This is extremely dangerous and has a psychological impact. The child is drawn to the scene, identifies or gets involved mentally in the scene, accepts the hero's actions and the "heroic" sex-scene is lodged in memory with encouragement to "imitate" the hero.


As stated, this was all during pre internet days, i'll speak about the devastation of pornography on the internet further on in this blog.


One such "hero" that was used 507 times (65% in playboy, 27% in penthouse and 8% in hustler) was santa claus. For example, his pants down below his knees, Santa is shown graphically mounting his reindeer from behind for sex (Playboy, January 1979). Children also can study Santa cannibalizing a child, his sharpened teeth bloody red, calling for another human meal (Playboy, January 1977). Santa murdered a little boy (Penthouse, December 1977), the child's head and body blown away, red blood splattered everywhere. Since he was often drawn as a victim himself, children could see Santa's blood spurting out as he was bloodily crucified by a giant mouse trap (Penthouse, October 1976). In the "Santa-as-a-pervert" theme, children are constantly cartooned as initiating, receiving, or observing sexual or violent activity with Santa Claus. Children sitting on Santa's lap were regularly either initiating or receiving some form of sex or violence with Santa. For example, one of the more brutal Penthouse cartoons was the violent rape of a little girl sitting on Santa's lap (Penthouse, December 1974) while he sang, "Santa Claus is coming ... ," his pants down around his ankles. And in December 1988, Penthouse celebrated Christmas with a naked, headless Tiny Tim about to be eaten for Christmas dinner by his family. Tim is "cartooned" with his naked buttocks prominent on a large serving platter and his father is saying, "God Bless Tiny Tim." (Excerpt from "Soft Porn Plays Hardball")


The significance of Santa to children is phenomenal, we are all aware of that and this makes Santa the most effective "child magnet" introduction to sexual deviance through sadistic and violent pornography. These are the gateway images for the attack on morality and children's innocence. Other well known fairytale characters and heros used in the 3 publications are Hansel & Gretal, Goldilocks, Little red riding hood, Snow White, Cinderalla, Wizard of Oz plus many more.....


Kinsey's idea that we are sexual from birth was even used to sexualise newborn babies and pregnant mothers! In Penthouse (August 1978) erotically illustrated a full-breasted, lactating woman, from her chin to waist, holding her naked infant with her hands, blood oozing down her neck and from the infant's lips and body.


The most egregious example, however, of sexualizing the newborn was in the September 1977 of Hustler: SCENE: A hospital viewing window for newborns-a neonate has jumped up from his hospital bed, laughingly grabbing onto the hair of his attending nurse as he plunges his oversized phallus into her mouth. The father, looking into the viewing window says to his friend, "That's my boy!".


Such sexualized illustrations are treacherous for the imaginations, belief systems, and behavior of sexually vulnerable adults or youths who have infants available to them! Increasingly hospital emergency wards give accounts of infants who are in agony from brutal lacerations and perforations of the throat, vagina, and anus, confirming the susceptibility of the public not only to "child sexuality" propaganda, but even to "infant sexuality" propaganda. It's very important to note that special needs children are extremely vulnerable and exposure to this type of content on both sides of the coin can be traumatic and devastating.


Children are never shown as asexually charming, lovely, and treasured in any pornographies and for good reason on the magazines part. Contempt for children is in keeping with the belief that the primary use for women is as depositories for intermittent male sexual release and violence. Loved children undermine the power of the sex industry to control men. Hence, children are the natural enemies of the sex industry, as are wives and mothers.


Psychiatrist Linnea Smith addressed images of ritualistic and satanic abuse in a personal correspondence dated 11 April 1988:


"Public and professional concern is growing regarding ritualistic abuse cases. Bizarre and sadistic rituals, acted out as part of a cult, satanic church, coven, or other occult organization include systematic emotional, physical, and sexual abuse of infants, children, and adults. Linking religious, pseudo-religious, or supernatural symbols and ceremonies with the abuse of victims often involves wearing robes or costumes, drinking blood and urine, smearing feces, animal and human mutilation, multi-perpetrator, multi-victim sexual abuse, torture, and homicide. These cartoons from Playboy magazine glamorizing and trivializing this type of activity for entertainment are unacceptable."


In total from the period 1953 to 1984 there were 6004 images/illustrations/cartoons found contained within playboy, penthouse and hustler which involved children in a sexual manner. Dr Judith Reisman used this to prove in court and won against playboy's "libel" case against her. Here are the details from the case.


"The research was an investigative analysis of PLAYBOY, PENTHOUSE and HUSTLER over the period of December 1953 to December 1984 to examine for nonviolent, violent, and criminal image portrayal and scenario involvement of children. The research reported the findings of 14,854 images of crime and violence and 6,004 images of children (with the predominate group being girls between ages 3 to 11 years) as part of the overall sexual and violent scenario. There were 989 sexual scenarios which included children actively involved with adults; and each magazine portrayed children as unharmed and/or benignly affected by the child/adult sex."


As pornographic material creates insecurity, anxiety and hostility in most normal people especially vulnerable and developing youth it's no surprise that child on child sexual abuse continues to rise, let's have a look at some of the data.


In Michigan in 1986, 681 adolescent sex offenders were identified. Between 1950 and 1979 the rate of serious crime committed by children increased 11,000% "including crimes such as forcible rape. " The average age of the sex offender was 15 and his average victim likely to be a 7 year old girl. This is an ENORMOUS increase in child on child sexual assault and is extremely worrying. Also bear in mind how long ago this was......93% of offenders were trusted acquaintances. Why this sudden increase in teenage boys abusing children? It strongly suggests that they were receiving some sort of "instruction" from somewhere as the assaults were almost identical.


Kinsey insisted that child sex offenders were mostly exhibitionists and perhaps sometimes "fondled" but rarely attempted penetration. The team had no record of juvenile or child sex rings, or of children being the chief victims of serial-rape murderers as is known today. Either;


1) their data was wildly false avoiding the tragic truths about child abuse to weaken protective laws and legitimize child sexual exploitation, or 2) sexual violence against children has dramatically increased since the Kinsey Reports helped initiate the sexual revolution, or 3) both are true. I lean towards the latter.


As many of us are aware, children learn from their environment, they learn through adults and adult behavior. When they are exposed to such graphic content showing adults engaging in explicit sexual acts, including children and animals then they will copy what they see. To a 12 year old boy a woman is unrealistic so they will always choose what is available to them, much younger children. This is an extremely difficult and disturbing fact to face but it's one that we NEED to in order to save mankind.


Dr. Becker, who served on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, reported that;


"89% of the 160 adolescent offenders whose average age was 15 reported that they use [sexually explicit] materials. 35% cited pornographic magazines, 26% pornographic videos, 15 % TV and 13 % books as the sexually explicit sources used most often. 67% said the material increased their sexual arousal. The number of sex crimes committed and the use of sexually explicit materials were not correlated according to Becker."


Testifying in the 1984 Senate Hearings on "Effect of Pornography on Women and Children," Rabun said that of fourteen hundred cases of suspected child exploitation;


"All, that is 100 percent of the arrested pedophiles, child pornographers, pimps, what have you, all of these, in effect child molesters had in their possession at the time of arrest, adult pornography ranging from what is in the literature typically referred to as soft pornography such as Playboy, on up to harder, such as Hustler."


Entrapment of the child, certified Rabun, proceeded from showing children;


"Pictures in decent magazines . . . progressing to something in the form or fashion of Playboy, where you had partial or full nudity going on, up until something like Penthouse and Hustler . . . all of which was done over a long period of time."


Other than our own personal testimonies and experiences of pornography, here are a few from "Soft Porn plays Hardball"......this is the reality for many families, lives completely ruined and for what?..... THIS??


"My two step-brothers showed me Playboy and Penthouse when I was about 10 years old and they were 14 or 15 years. They first explained how pretty the women were and then insisted I take off my clothes like these ladies. I was threatened if I didn't and then was threatened after I did. They made me pose like the women in Playboy and then like the ones in the other magazines, and yes, they raped me many times."


Wife of a Dentist who read playboy and hustler;


"He has molested ten of his patients. He does this by turning his nitrous oxide up to three times as much as is normal and safe. Then he asks the nurse to leave the room .... John has molested our daughter . . .. I saw a man whom I cared for deteriorate over a period of eleven years. I saw pornography that is sold at a lot of the convenience stores come to dominate the only real influence to that man's existence. I'm not about that kind of pornography that is sold in those kinky little sex shops. I am talking about magazines that are sold in local convenience stores. The pornography John collected, and was obsessed with was Penthouse, Hustler and Playboy."


"For more than thirty years I watched pornography destroy our marriage. We live in a fairly small community in Wisconsin where pornographic material was not readily available during the first years of our marriage. The addiction began with Playboy, cheap paperbacks, obscene playing cards and R-rated movies. It then progressed to movies of lesbians and prostitutes he secured through the mail. He could have destroyed me as a person if it were not for the memories I have of myself and my life before I met him. Masturbation took over our sex life. I know for a fact that pornography destroyed our marriage."


These cases are non exhaustive and always will be while pornography is accessible in any form. In complete opposite to the "Father of the sexual revolution" (Kinsey's) idea that sexual liberty would mean "sexual health" and less divorce, less abuse etc we can see now and could as far back as the 60's, that it was not only NONE of those things, but caused the following;


* Pre-marital sexual relations

* Increased sadistic and machochistic masturbation

* Impotence in those addicted to pornography

* Increased rates of divorce

* Increased rates of single mothers and povertym

* Increased rates of venereal disease

* Increased teen pregnancies

* Increased abortions

* Increase in sex offenders

* Increase in pedophiles

* Increase in incest

* Increase in child on child sexual abuse

* Increase in mental illness, particularly in children

* Increase in rape and murder

* Increase in homicides

* Increase in suicides


There are more than this no doubt, but you get the idea. We have a serious problem wouldn't you agree? Do you see how deep rooted this is already? What the influence of these men has done to our whole society? It's a real worry, evidently.


While the average male was becoming increasingly occupied with paper dolls and masturbation, changing the very fabric of the typical male PRE kinsey days, it also changed the woman's life and therefore the child.....some mothers have gone from protecting their babies and nurturing them, to selling them out to sex offenders.


A Northern Virginia mother and her boyfriend were arrested in 1989 for sexually renting her three little boys, and for "first-degree rape" of her two and one-half-year-old daughter. One small son said a man "came in and had sex with all of us, including Mama" (Washington Post, 22 August 1989).


The next day (23 August 1989) a clipping in the Washington Post noted, "A New York couple was charged yesterday with sexually assaulting or torturing ... raping, sodomizing, or beating nine of their [twelve] children, ranging in age from 4 months to 16 years." Police were digging for the "remains of the children said to have been buried."


Wives have also been pushed into believing that women are sex objects and should be available for her husbands desires, whatever they may be, in order to keep their husbands, many did as they were told, still do, and many can't keep up the facade and are forced to leave. Hence the introduction to the truly broken society. Children passed between pillar and post through messy divorces, left mentally and emotionally scarred through the break up and this carries on into adult hood. Although denied by many, it DOES have an impact in many ways, including psychologically. Again, this is all thanks to the soft porn industry and it's unrealistic and down right incorrect "view" on sexuality. Let's look at some more examples of juvenile offending.....


In a small item in the Washington Post (9 February 1991), seven boys from age eight to thirteen were arrested. "The group is alleged to have dragged the victim into her bedroom and raped her, officials said."


Ten year old Rosie Gordon was abducted as she rode her bike on a Burke, Virginia street in July 1989. She was raped and murdered.


An eleven-year-old girl in the affluent suburb outside Washington, D.C., was abducted as she was walking to her elementary school. The child was not killed. But, like Rosie, she was driven to a rural area, raped, and sodomized (Washington Times, 25 August 1989).


The television film Adam told of the abduction of Adam Walsh from a department store by two homosexual rapist-killers. The child was brutally raped and then decapitated. From this heinous crime came the Center for Missing and Exploited Children in Washington, DC. Indeed, SLAM (Society League Against Molesters), was formed by the grandmother of a four year-old girl. The child was abducted from her own yard, tortured, raped unmercifully, and then brutally murdered. Again, the killer was a sex offender out on parole.


In a 7 June 1989 rape/mutilation report from the Washington Times, "[A seven-year-old] boy was riding his red bicycle through the residential wilderness when ... he was grabbed from behind by a man who wrapped a rope tightly around his neck and dragged him into a brushy area along the creek." This little boy was stabbed and raped, his penis "cut off up to his abdomen" by a child sex offender out on parole. The parolee, Earl Shriner, began his recorded violent attacks on younger children when he was fifteen-years-old.


In Oakes v. the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the child pornography case before the United States Supreme Court, the step-father who photographed his fourteen-year-old step-daughter, said he wanted to make her "big for Playboy. "


Do you think "soft porn" really liberated people and helped with "sexual relationships?" or has it instead proven to be the opposite of that? shown to be extremely dangerous causing devastation all over?? I'll let you be the judge of this after you've researched further in your own time. I strongly recommend Dr Judith Reismans "Soft Porn Plays Hardball" that you can find linked earlier in the blog and will also find on my recommended reading page. Please also take time to research Dr Reismans website where you will find an abundance of information regarding Kinsey, Hefner and the pornography industry plus much more. Reisman was an earth angel hell bent on protecting children who committed over 5 decades to exposing Kinsey's research and trying to close down the Kinsey Institute, which still runs today along with hundreds of other "sex research labs" all over the world. She died on the 9th April 2021 10 days post covid vaccine.


The reason for the increased widespread funding on "human sexuality" was because the whole legal system was changed in the 50's to accommodate Kinsey's research and now his ideologies are deeply rooted into society and into the education system under the guise of "healthy and safe sexual relationships". On the surface this may appear to sound beneficial, until you dig deeper and the real intention and true horror is revealed.


PIE (Pedophile Information Exchange) was set up in 1974 by gay activist Michael Hanson from Edinburgh who became Chairman: Founder Tom O'Carroll and co-founder Ian Dunn. The group's stated aim was "to alleviate the suffering of many adults and children" by campaigning to abolish the age of consent thus legalising sex between adults and children. Tom O Carroll stated that not many people were aware of the organisation at that time - namely "readers of gay newspapers and magazines, and others in gay circles who had heard by word of mouth".



Other than the campaigning to abolish age of consent, PIE also gave advice and counsel to pedophiles who wanted it, and provided a means for pedophiles to contact one another. They were also "exchanging" pedophilic material through the mail.


When asked what constitutes as "consent" from a child, O Carroll simply stated, "it would be up to the individuals involved." - so from this stance then, a 10 year old "consenting" to sexual relationships with an adult is basically down to whatever the abuser deems as consent! because the 10 year old CANNOT consent, they don't have the mind capacity to agree to these things, they are not mentally or physically mature enough, it's OUTRAGEOUS to believe that children can consent to this. Nevertheless, PIE and other organisations pushed that "adult sex with children" (rape) was indeed harmless to them. PIE submitted a 17-page document to the Home Office's Criminal Law Revision Committee in which it proposed that there should be no age of consent, and that the criminal law should concern itself only with sexual activities to which consent is not given, or which continue after prohibition by a civil court.


A magazine called "understanding pedophilia" in which, as the title suggests, aimed to establish respectability for pedophilia was replaced with the magazine "Magpie" in which members (pedophiles) placed advertisements, giving their membership number, general location, and brief details of their sexual and other interests. Replies were handled by PIE, with a box number system, so that correspondents were unidentifiable until they chose to exchange their own details.


Although there was push back at the time from angry mothers that became aware of PIE, and some people within a few organisations aired concern and disgust - for the most part, they were left alone it seems. There were some organisations that agreed with PIE's ideologies and were even funded by the Government! In March 2014, evidence emerged that PIE had received grants totaling £70,000 from the Home Office, after a whistleblower told police he witnessed a successful three-year grant renewal application for £35,000 in 1980, implying that a similar grant had been made in 1977.


Eventually there was some legal action against members of PIE for numerous crimes after a full scale inquiry into PIE's activities was held in 1978;


* 5 activists were charged with printing contact advertisements in Magpie which were calculated to promote indecent acts between adults and children. Many of them had lesser charges of sending indecent material through the mail if they testified against the five.

* Steven Adrian Smith was Chairperson of PIE from 1979 to 1985. He was one of the PIE executive committee members charged in connection with the contact advertisements; he fled to Holland before the trial.

* Two former executive committee members of PIE had been convicted on child pornography charges but acquitted on charges of incitement to commit unlawful sexual acts with children and that the group's leader had fled the country while on bail.

* One-time treasurer of PIE Charles Napier became an English Language Trainer at the British Council and was convicted of sexual assault against minors in London in 1995 and investigated as an alleged member of a pedophile network operating in British schools in 1996. He set up his own school in Turkey and resumed English Language Training with the British Council after serving his sentence. Napier was accused in 2005 by journalist Francis Wheen of having sexually assaulted boys while a gym master at Copthorne Preparatory School. Wheen gave evidence at Napier's 2014 trial, waiving his right to anonymity. Napier was convicted in December 2014 and jailed for 13 years for child sexual abuse.

* In January 2006, the Metropolitan Police Service Pedophile Unit arrested remaining PIE members on child pornography charges. One of those arrested, David Joy, was warned by his sentencing judge that his beliefs may preclude his ever being released from jail.

* Douglas Slade, who was involved in both the Pedophile Action for Liberation (PAL) and PIE, was convicted at Bristol Crown Court in June 2016, and sentenced to 24 years imprisonment. He was found guilty of multiple counts of indecent assault and other sexual offences against victims aged between 10 and 16 committed between 1965 and 1980. It was said during his trial, that Slade had run what was effectively a helpline to aid the practices of child sex abusers from his parent's Bristol home in the 1960s and 1970's.

* In 1981, the former PIE Chair Tom O'Carroll was convicted on the conspiracy charge and sentenced to two years in prison.


PIE, an open pedophile group had affiliations with many other organisations including the Albany Trust and the NCCL (National Council for Civil Liberties - now "Liberty") - ran for almost a whole decade and even though the group closed down in 1984, they have continued through other organisations, or at least using certain groups as leverage for this very same acceptance of pedophilia - it didn't disappear when PIE closed down, it was just the start and the agenda shifted to other organisations. Other groups that supported PIE were; Campaign for Homosexuality Equality; Gay Left; Spartacus International Gay Guide.


There were also many allegations among senior politicians of an elite pedophile ring involving Leon Britton, Lord Janner , Sir Cyril Smith and a former head of MI6, Sir Peter Telford Hayman all now confirmed pedophiles.





For more information on pedophiles within the establishment please watch this short documentary "Spies, Lords and Predators" and conduct your own further research.


In December 1977, police raided a house in a Boston suburb. Twenty-four men were arrested and indicted on over 100 felony counts of the statutory rape of boys aged eight to fifteen. The men had used drugs and video games to lure the boys into a house, where they photographed them as they engaged in sexual activity. The men were members of a "sex ring"; A Boston magazine described NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) as "the most despised group of men in America", which was "founded mostly by eccentric, boy-loving leftists". NAMBLA was set up to help those men who "loved" boys find "material" including videos and images, basically seeking young boys to groom. They called themselves a "political and educational" organisation.


NAMBLA sent free monthly subscriptions to mostly prisoners.....if you can believe it..... So those most likely incarcerated for rape and sexual offending including pedophilia were given a "safe haven" to re-offend when they were released from prison. Incredibly, only about half of the bulletins sent to prisons were refused. Is this not encouraging more deviant behaviour? Watch this documentary on NAMBLA for further research purposes and a deeper look into the disturbing mentality of NAMBLA members. It's highly concerning listening to the way they speak and how they think, in that it's completely natural and unharmful to be stalking and grooming young teenage boys because apparently these youngsters WANT it - and if they can "consent" then what's the problem right?

gif

Pro pedophilia groups Like NAMLBA and others started to really form, increasing it's members from 25 to 1500 in only a few years, attempting to saturate society with their "sexual liberation" ideologies post Kinsey Era (unsurprisingly). Many of them became increasingly vocal in backing NAMBLA (as they did PIE) but there was also a huge pushback from many parts of the Gay community who stated CLEARLY that they were NOT affiliated with NAMBLA and absolutely did NOT agree with anything they stood for. Much like there are those among the LGBT community today who are completely unaware of the other organisations who were affiliated with PIE and NAMBLA that attach themselves to these causes but are intending to use it for nefarious purposes, there are those who DO know and encourage the push for "Love is Love".


They use the "love is love" slogan to justify age restrictions too......according to them, if the child can "consent" then it shouldn't matter, "age is just a number" and that these relationships are "meaningful" and "joyous" based upon Kinsey's idea of humans being sexual from birth. This is through the mind of a pedophile and simply a justification for their unhealthy and criminal beliefs AND behaviour! They believe it's "harmless" but is it? I've met victims, listened to their heart breaking testimonies and read hundreds of cases from victims of child sexual abuse and understandably it never ends well. No doubt many of you reading this will know it too as some will be the victims i'm speaking of. I've personally only read hundreds, but there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of cases in reality and rising.


When speaking to addicts of drugs and alcohol especially, you find that many of them were sexually abused as children, many of them attempt suicide and unfortunately, many of them succeed. The dangerous notion that "Adult-child sex" as Kinsey and associates called it, is "harmless" to children is INSANITY. Not only did Kinsey not live long enough to see his dream reality play out and the subsequent devastation caused, we can see and pin point almost the EXACT time of increase in all things bad and the complete opposite of what Kinsey "concluded". Absolutely ZERO long term studies were conducted, in that, victims of child sexual abuse were not followed for a considerable period into the future and into adulthood to see how they coped and how they proceeded in life. Again, had they conducted that vital part of their "research" the whole Kinseyan nightmare would have proven fraudulent at the time. We know about these cases because of the devastation left behind and the many people's lives completely destroyed directly because of the abuse they received when they were children.


Peter Tatchell, former Labour Parliamentary Candidate/Official and "Human Rights Campaigner" is more prominently known for his work with LGBT social movements. Tatchell was the man at the heart of lowering the age of consent for the gay community from 18 down to 16. He also contributed a chapter to a book compiled of members of PIE. The book, called "Betrayal of youth" or "Boy" for short was put together by convicted pedophile John Parrett, former vice-chairman of PIE and published in 1986. This book was written with the goal of abolishing consent completely, leaving the doors WIDE OPEN for pedophiles to easily access their prey without fear of retribution. Tatchell still advocates for consent to be lowered to 14 and further in restricted circumstances – in some examples given, as young as 8 years old.


"Betrayal of Youth" is still in British Libraries today although only within the safety of the vaults and can only be viewed with protection and under supervised conditions to avoid it being viewed by accident. After being reviewed under request by researchers, although Tatchell attempts to play down his part in the book, it transpired that he DID in fact contribute to this clear pro pedophile publication. With horrifying chapter after chapter, one on incest and another on "How to make pedophilia acceptable" (directly proceeding Tatchells Chapter) plus more, Tatchells contribution can be found in Chapter 9 of the publication "Questioning ages of Majority and Consent".


In 1997 Tatchell wrote a letter to the Guardian stating that he was aware of several instances of pedophiles having "sex with children" of both sexes as young as 9 and claimed it brought the children "great joy"....

“[…] Several of my friends gay and straight, male and female had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy […]”

OutRage activists stood outside the House of Commons carrying placards that read "16 IS JUST THE START" displaying a more sinister agenda and anyone to oppose lowering the age of consent were called homophobes and bigots.


Tatchell went on to be a key part within the LGBT movement although i'm quite certain that the majority of it's followers have no clue about Tatchell and his past and if they did, they would disassociate themselves from him immediately. It's another case of using the movement towards the goal of acceptance of pedophilia and they've been quite successful to a degree which i'll explain later on.....Labour have a track record of aiding in pushing these absurd, criminal ideologies onto society and it's members have backed the likes of PIE. Let's not forget that Labour MP Patricia Hewitt backed the NCCL (National Council for Civil Liberties) to lower the age of consent to TEN years old.


Just a reminder that these gravely dangerous societal changes all across the world can be attributed to one man and his team, Kinsey. With his sexual liberation in mind, and with many leftists being ever more sucked into this doctrine of "anything goes" it was not a surprise when all of a sudden, seemingly out of the blue and overnight, came the HUGE push for transgenderism. Many will read this and argue that transgenders have always been around and that may be, but to the extent we see today? The odd one here and there perhaps but it has skyrocketed over the last few years. Does it make you wonder why a minority group with such insignificance (as in such miniscule numbers) in just a few years took such a grip, changing laws and policies and basically reforming society as a whole? Where did they all come from and why are we seeing a MASSIVE increase in transgenders year after year? and in younger and younger children? It's almost like they are LEARNING it from somewhere isn't it? Where is this influence coming from?......


This is a very interesting listen - a debate between UKIP member David Kurton and "Human Rights Activist" Peter Tatchell from 2017 hosted by RT News. David did a fantastic job of bringing this absurd notion that babies as young as two need to be involved in ANY way of learning about sexuality, to light. His points are valid - children don't need to know it, it has nothing to do with assuring that children are aware so that they know how to treat and accept others. We only have to look back through the last few decades to see this.


As a child i was what you would call a "tom boy" - i played in brooks and streams, climbed trees and got muddy, fought with my brother and didn't wear pretty dresses. It wasn't an issue, there were other girls like me too, but we took literally no notice as it hadn't been brought to our attention and placed into our sponge like minds, we just carried on as normal and developed naturally. We didn't wonder if we were born in the wrong body! why would we? Is that not just confusing for an immature mind? or ANY mind for that matter? Considering it's a flat out lie?


Teaching children that they are potentially born into the wrong body is nonsense and based on ideology and not science. Our anatomy and our chromosomes define our gender, it's that simple. Thanks to the new education model of "Relationships and Sexuality", teaching children that they can be one of over 100 genders is now standard practice. It is BLATANTLY extremely damaging. Tatchell tries to argue that almost half of transgenders attempt/commit suicide and although that is correct, it isn't for the reasons that he states.


Walt Heyer was a transgender for almost a decade and after transitioning back to his original male gender he went on to help other transgenders transition back when they came to him for help and support, still hugely suffering. Heyer is a life saver and I mean that in the literal sense of the phrase. He has his own website called "Transregret" which you should take note of looking at. Read how Walt came to transition from male to female and then back again here. There are many testimonies from those saved from suicide by Heyer and his amazing support network for those left out in the cold as a result of the confusing and dangerously misleading information received on top of abuse and child hood trauma. To this day, he is attacked and called transphobic and homophobic by the transgender community.


There are many disturbing facts that appear to be being ignored becoming the "elephant in the room" so to speak (or at least ONE of them, there are many...) - Some facts about the effects of gender dysphoria;


* 30% of transgenders commit suicide as mental disorders remain ignored and undiagnosed.

* 90% of those transitioned want to change back to their own gender within a few years.

* Gender distress have one of a handful of unresolved mental illnesses that exists side by side with their gender stress.

* Suicide.org states that 90% of all suicides are the direct result of untreated mental illness.

* More than 800 children in the UK as young as 10 were given puberty blockers by the summer of 2017 after the NHS scrapped the "age limit" in 2014.

* Transgenders that want to transition back are shunned by the transgender community, leaving them more open to depression and further mental disorders that end up resulting in attempted or actual suicide.

* Hormone blockers cause infertility and suicidal thoughts.

* The effects of hormone blockers can be irreversible.


Read more on side effects of hormone blockers here. For a more in depth reading on the dangers, please read through this. These are not isolated cases, there are thousands of them and climbing. Remember, this medication is being given out like sweets to children as young as ten years old, before they decide whether to go full transition and have the necessary dangerous and devastating surgery that is undergone and eventually regretted in 90% of cases. Something the media likes to keep from the masses. In fact, the media will have you believe that any transgender suicide that happens is because they weren't accepted by the majority of people, were bullied into depression and therefore couldn't live any longer but this isn't the case, it's because the underlying mental issue/issues were completely ignored and remained undiagnosed, without help of any kind and they were still deeply troubled, depressed, anxious and suffering.


It's crazy that on the one hand, through the education system, political system and TV land, children as young as three are being "taught" about sexuality as a positive thing, and that they can be born in the wrong body and be the opposite sex if they choose, or they can be binary, or non-binary, or any of the other fabricated genders. The frightening thing is, is that it's celebrated and massively encouraged by society as a whole! Even the suggestion of these confusing and misleading ideologies protruding a very immature brain can and IS evidently causing severe damage, and yet on the other hand, these very same promoting outlets make absolutely ZERO mention of the blatant dangers of implementing this in society!


No mention of the NINETY % that want to transition back to their real gender in adulthood, or their severe mental illness that causes 30% to commit suicide? No mention that gender reassignment is VERY rarely successful, in that, the individual still isn't happy, in fact in many cases become much worse, hence the advanced depressive state. At this stage though, they've had breast implants and their penis removed, or in a FtM (Female to Male transition) a double mastectomy. This then causes even further anxiety and depression, along with all of the other effects from the hormone blockers and other drugs used to bring the body OUT of homeostasis. It's hyped up to children and the after effects, clearly disastrous in most cases are being completely ignored or dismissed?


So why is something evidently so damaging to adults, being forced upon very young children? Why are we being silenced for pointing this out instead of heard in a fair way? Why are people being labelled as bigots and transphobes for bringing this to light? Why do children even need to learn about sexuality AT ALL until teenage years? and even then it should only be from a biological perspective!


They tried numerous times to normalise sexuality in a big way as we've already spoken about and to confuse and blur the lines in order to legalise pedophilia over the years and get rid of "age of CONSENT". PIE and NAMBLA are fine examples of this but to get there, they need to pull out all of the stops and bring the whole "love is love" thing into scope. This is why the LGBT movement was used in a massive way, it's a HUGE movement funded by some unscrupulous organisations and individuals which many members are completely unaware of as previously mentioned.


Little by little, acceptance crept in so we can stay in line with "political correctness" and this is for younger and younger children. Is it beneficial to confuse and traumatise children on the basis of a few adults that think they are in the wrong body and suffer with some form of mental illness due to trauma or abuse and/or massive influence? Is this really about "acceptance?" or something more? Something more sinister.


To be clear, this is not an attack on transgenders, these are simply the facts of the matter that are necessary to explain for the full picture, which is ironically what people totally miss. They have been programmed to retaliate in a certain manner, a jump to defense of anything said negatively in regards to trans in a knee jerk reaction that instantly puts the issue to bed without question. A very dangerous game to play in ANY case....


For example, a few years back, a very young drag queen called "Desmond" (stage name "desmond is amazing") was being paraded around America at Gay Pride events and even night clubs, on full show, in full drag with mostly adult males who were also drag queens. Encouraged by his parents from age 2, Desmond was the youngest ever drag queen. He was also "performing" at nightclubs into the early hours of the morning, dancing around on stage while grown men gave him dollar bills......this is CLEAR exploitation of a MINOR! he was 11 years old! Oddly enough CPS (Child Protective Services) didn't think it was an issue!


Had I pimped out my 10 year old daughter in a night club, social services would be around to my home by morning, removing her from my care. So why didn't this happen?? This is CHILD abuse! even by their own lenient standards of sex offending in the judicial system. It's a VERY sexualised place for him to be as an 11 year old CHILD, with adults using illicit drugs around him. It's ILLEGAL! He should be playing in parks and climbing trees! If you research this further you will come across some very disturbing footage and images of this young lad which will make your blood run cold, i'll leave that up to you, if you decide to look....this young boy is literally being abused and exploited to the world and NOTHING is being done about it. Sickening.


The whole point of bringing Desmond into it is to show how it's being normalised to CHILDREN - similar to "story time" which was set up in libraries, nurseries and hospitals to "teach" children as young as TWO about pro-gay, pro-trans and "alt sex"....The drag queen promotes stories of a sexual nature and lies on the floor for the children to lie on top of him.....is it just me or is this extremely creepy, completely inappropriate and even traumatising for some children???


The goal is to sexualise children from birth so that pedophiles can have "relationships" with them in the name of "love is love" and "age is just a number". Do you see the connection to "anything goes" and "love is love?" especially when we consider that "CONSENT" is the biggest driver here? When they speak of children "consenting" to gender change, pills and eventually surgery and are "aware of sexuality" by age 9/10 according to Tavistock and "sexologists" etc, then they are able to consent to a whole range of things aren't they???, including SEX! We will come back to this further on and the psychology surrounding it but for now, how do they get the masses to accept this? we can say right now that we couldn't EVER be conditioned to accept pedophilia, but that i'm afraid, seems to be the case.


"Various beliefs can be implanted in many people after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger, or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgement and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of 'herd instinct,' and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility." - TAVISTOCK


Although this is a very delicate subject, it's one that needs addressing for obvious reasons, hopefully i've at least given a little bit of insight. I have and will more than likely continue to be attacked on this subject, simply because people are mostly unaware of the true agenda, and make no mistake, there most definitely IS one and this is only part of it. Many of my bans on social media have been for transgender related posts. I'm highly censored on this issue. I will continue to speak out because our children are in danger, not from transgenders themselves but from the dogma and influence from everything around them, at school, at home, on the TV, in films, in childrens films and the music industry where it is being normalised, encouraged and promoted in a sexual way.


It's ironic that actually many transgenders know this and some do speak out - Let's leave the children out of it and allow them to be children. Advocating a lifestyle which we know is damaging children is not something i would ever promote simply because it's damaging to children and for no other reason. Let's not forget that we know how harmful it can be to adults so why would we encourage something that we know impacts devastation to them, onto children? It just doesn't make any sense? If we remain quiet on these issues in fear of repercussion of any kind, then we fail our children and things will become increasingly worse as we've previously discussed.


So let's tie these in together in terms of the main end goal. When i say "tie them together" i am not saying they are one and the same, i'm saying that they have each been used towards a much bigger goal. Combined they were used to weaken the family, destroy the wife and child and bring sexual deviance, promiscuity promoting and encouraging "sexual liberty" of ANY kind, including "adult-child sex" (rape) incest and bestiality.


We can see how Kinsey ideology has crept into EVERY aspect of our lives over the last 8 decades, changing the whole fabric of society through the legal, educational and political systems causing mass destruction and until now, has miraculously and largely gone unnoticed so it seems. Over time, we can see that some of the very people who end up in serious positions of power and authority seem to be involved and get charged and convicted for child sexual abuse, often found with thousands of images of "child porn" (abuse of children) on their devices. This is a known fact and there are hundreds of articles you can read of such cases. Here are just a few examples;


Barry Bennell Ex Football Coach

Judge accused of child abuse

List of MP's convicted of Child Sex Abuse

Choirmaster guilty of Child Sex Abuse

Pastor and wife convicted of historical Child Abuse


This list could go on and on and on. There are hundreds more of these accounts in this very comprehensive website "timetostartcaring.com" where you can find information, links and sources on;


Child sex offenders in the British Government

Public Official Freemasons

Sex offences committed by members of parliament

Corrupt Judiciary

Westminster Pedophile Ring

List of corrupt police officers

MP's convicted of Sex Offences


These are just a few subjects covered within the website, there are many more.....I would strongly recommend you spend some time reading through the information within it, although the details are disturbing they are vitally important to know. Who are the people in "charge?" Are they just and honest people? See for yourselves.


If this doesn't shake people, i don't know what will. These are the same people that are controlling every aspect of our lives yet not only do they have complete disregard for the general public, many of them are highly involved in systematic child abuse! The abuse of the most vulnerable in society is shameful and disgraceful! In many cases, CRIMINAL!


Before we go on to discuss how it effects us today, particularly within the education system it's important to at least touch on the other avenues used to sexualise children.


TV, Film and music, in particular, Hollywood. Without delving into the depths of hell, there is absolutely no denying how deeply embedded pedophilia is within this industry. Much of it has been exposed in the public, especially in recent years. Child stars are often seriously abused, many end up drug addicts and/or dead. Although the typical "movie star" lifestyle is presented to the world on the big screen as something incredible, something to "wish" for and strive for, to be envious of and to dream about, the reality is much different. The media, being the biggest arm of influence right across the world, use their leverage to push these people into the limelight and all over the screens in everyone's homes, posing in extravagant attire and looking flawless at the red carpet events, painting the picture of perfection and misleading their "fans" into believing they have such an amazing existence and that being "famous" will make you happy. They spend billions on this show in able to give this impression. THEATRE and nothing more, it's horrendous.


These false idols are evidently extremely influential. This is the intent. It's the whole point of the industry and it works well. Corey Haim was raped behind a trailer on the set of the film Lucas when he was 11 years old. It ruined his life, life long addictions to many drugs until he died at age 38 in 2010. It was well known that the "Corey's" were being "passed around" between adult males within the industry, but nothing was done about it. Why would they? this has been going on for decades. Child star Heather O Rourke died at age 12 with a perforated bowel. She was anally raped, she did not die in the way the public was told for obvious reasons, that poor innocent little girl was murdered in the most horrific way.

Many of the child hollywood stars (if not ALL) have to endure adults molesting and raping them. They are drugged for most of the time. If they even dare speak out against this machine, they are threatened or killed, as is the case with Chester Beddington, his best friend Chris Cornell and Isaac Kappy who were in the midst of collecting the evidence to blow the whistle on horrific child abuse in Hollywood and the music industry including human trafficking and elite pedophile rings.